Recent Updates RSS Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • Kevin Chiu 3:18 am on January 27, 2012 Permalink | Reply  

    Manufacturing for America 

    Recently, I listened to a documentary on how Apple manufactures the iPhone. It was quite enlightening. I also read about their manufacturing experiences with Foxconn and other Chinese suppliers. In summary, China’s primary advantage, aside from the low cost of labor, is a massive speed advantage in ramping up or reconfiguring assembly lines.

    This gave me an idea for American manufacturing. Although we can’t undercut Chinese wages, the price per part can be minimized via high throughput reconfigurable automation.

    An initial proof of concept might involve CNC mills, laser cutters, pick-and-place machines, or even 3D printers. However, as the concepts and methods mature, it is not difficult to imagine the addition of reconfigurable roll-to-roll assembly of the majority of the complex innards of products, requiring no human interaction whatsoever. The throughput of such a factory would be staggering…

     
  • Kevin Chiu 2:21 pm on January 20, 2012 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , ,   

    MSFT earnings performance compared to AAPL and GOOG 

     
  • Kevin Chiu 3:59 am on January 17, 2012 Permalink | Reply
    Tags:   

    Google, please fix this. 

    Mocality fraud

    http://blog.mocality.co.ke/2012/01/13/google-what-were-you-thinking/

    OpenStreetMap sabotage

    http://opengeodata.org/google-ip-vandalizing-openstreetmap

     
  • Kevin Chiu 2:04 am on January 9, 2012 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: ,   

    People often ask me how I break down complex problems and provide simple solutions so quickly.

    Here is the answer.

    1. Divide.

    The idea that there is such thing as a problem that is infeasible due to technical complexity is an illusion. Everything that appears complex is recursively made up of simpler components, and once you know those components — the fundamental concepts that anchor the problem (and potential solution) in the realm of possibility — the illusion vanishes.

    The trick is knowing what these components are or knowing someone who does – the more knowledge you have here, the further you can progress before encountering an indivisible sub-problem.

    2. Conquer.

    Once the problem is broken down into its fundamental requirements, it’s much easier to understand which parts are easy or already solved, which may require some research, and which are new.

    A problem is almost never unique although it may appear unique on the surface. By pattern matching on historical work, much of the solution complexity can be delegated.

    So, now what’s left is a set problems that you’ve never seen before.

    3. Play.

    Playing with new problems is often the quickest way to become acquainted with them. People tend to get caught up in analysis paralysis or worrying about the “correct” way to do something. This is all overhead to finding a solution.

    Get dirty, make mistakes — the path to a novel solution is not paved.

     
  • Kevin Chiu 6:54 am on December 29, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags:   

    A thought on current financial matters 

    How do governments expect to provide relief for the economy if their primary input is to provide liquidity to arbitrage experts? Wouldn’t all that financial aid simply be arbitraged into the coffers of the financial world in the most profit-maximizing way possible?

     
c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
e
edit
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
l
go to login
h
show/hide help
shift + esc
cancel